Wow! I'm seen some unbelievable feats of magic in my time, but this one takes the cake....

 

 http://ca.news.yahoo.com/s/capress/090330/national/que_not_the_father

 

 I had no idea our Provincial governments could reverse, or completely override, the longstanding, scientific principles of human biology! The fact that this poor shumuck now has to beg and plead his case before The Supreme Court of Canada, just shows how desperate the Provinces are to take some degree of financial and social responsibility out of THEIR hands, and lay it at the feet of someone completely underserving of such a burden. Again. WOW. With tricks like this, they should be working their own show five nights a week at 'The Palms', in Las Vegas.

 

 I love how the Province trys to put the blame on the man, by saying the gentlemen in question, "acted like dad". Well...OF COURSE he did! He didn't know he was dating a CHEATING WHORE OF A WOMAN, who was engaging in UNPROTECTED SEX behind his back. He's damn-near lucky he didn't catch HIV in the process. In addition to what he's currently being dragged through.

 

 Gentlemen. If you've ever need more reason to keep it in your pants at all times, you have it now! 

 If you've ever wanted proof-positive the Canadian justice system is a complete and total farce, you'll find it here:

 

 http://www.citynews.ca/news/news_32644.aspx

 

 Only in Canada can a person commit such a henious crime, be coherant enough to attempt an escape, admit guilt immediately upon being captured, and STILL be found "NOT GUILTY, BY REASON OF MENTAL DISEASE" by a judge, that can't even find his ass, with both hands and a map.

 

 I'm utterly lost for words. Really.

 

 To add insult to injury, in an attempt to justify his decision, Judge Scurfield actually states, "That does not mean that he should go free. People who are found not criminally responsible but who continue to pose a danger to the community may be kept in a locked institution for the rest of their lives.". The key word being "MAY".

 

  Because the vast majority of the "thinking" public such as myself, KNOW more often than not, that's NOT what happens. The "Schizophrenic" man that murdered my neighbour in cold blood several years back was "confined" to a hospital for...IF YOU CAN BELIVE THIS...a LIFE-ALTERING, SIX MONTHS. And in some medical circles, that's considered a "lengthy" institutional stay. After which, they'll be let back into society. ONCE AGAIN repeating the process of refusing to take their medication, and ONCE AGAIN becoming a threat to society. Just like the "Schizophrenic" woman that vandalized my car yesterday at Tim Horton's in Mississauga. Because someone wouldn't give her money to by crack. But HEY! "It's not their fault. They're sick.", right?

 

 The "I hear voices" defense has become so watered-down over the last 30 years from repeated use, it honestly needs to be stricken altogether for the legal system. We've gotten to the point where even trained psychiatrists can no longer diagnose who's legitimately ill, and who is not. The above case is just one glaring example of such. As "offensive" as this may sound to many? I'm sorry: Schizophrenics SHOULD NOT be afforded the same rights as individuals stricken with other diseases. It's an entirely different matter altogether if a person suffering from such takes their medication religiously, and are not a threat to the general public. However, those that don't, and end up comitting crimes of this magnitude, need to be locked away for the rest of their natural lives. Thus protecting the greater good.

 

 We don't allow people to roam the streets with loaded firearms, dangerous animals, or weapons of any sort. So why do we make the exception for an individual who, for all intents and purposes, is an "explosive waiting to go off at any moment"? Because they don't want to take their medicine? OH! The hardships of having to pop a pill! 

 

 This is "justice", Mr. Scurfield? Why thank you, sir! I feel SO MUCH SAFER!

 

 I wonder how he'd feel if this man moved next door to him?