Dustin's profileThis Sordid LifePhotosBlogListsMore  |  Tools Help |
|
March 29 Weekend News.... Can you say "George Orwell's 1984"?
Is there any more substantial proof to the Pink Floyd phrase, "Another brick in the wall."? Could mulit-million dollar corporations get ANY more impersonal amd controling than they already are? Apparently so.
And speaking of "proof"....
Here's further proof, the Liberal government hates people who drive......
I mean, why else would you penalize someone who's worked for the right to own a vehicle?
And speaking of "rights". Or should I say the lackthereof.....
"Zimbabweans are making a statement against the meddling British establishment,". Ya. Right. Because it's done so well on its own. Any shread of humanity and civility that country ever contained, was lost along with its British influence and work ethic. Along with the countless white farmers, who's murders were not only state-sanctioned, but glorified over. Yup. Enjoy your impoverished, third-world shithole, kids. It's all yours for the burning.
And that's the news!
Gh0sT March 19 Would I vacation in Mexico? NOT ON YOUR LIFE.
For many reasons. But here's just a few.....
And a few MORE....
I'll stick to snow drifts, thank you.
Gh0sT
March 16 Weekend Update..... Cheating, phony explosives being placed in public buildings, and now this......
Ryerson is turning out to be a...*COUGH, COUGH*..."wonderful" institution. Nice hypocritical stance you took there, guys. Crucifying a student, for rallying against your invitation to some VERY questionable "guest speakers", with a dose of your own medicine. Speakers, who just happen to be members of one of the most powerful and militantly racist oraganizations, in ALL of North American: THE BLACK PANTHERS. A group that has purposely endorsed violence on all non-blacks, to suit their own agenda. But it's just the Klan that are "bad", right? How's that foot taste in your politically-correct mouth? Ya. That's what I thought.
And speaking of all things "hypocritical"......
David Miller wants to promote Toronto as a "tourist destination", and a "world class city". Yet he spends his every waking moment, trying to make it more and more inhospitable. I mean, why else would you hike parking infractons THREE HUNDRED PERCENT in some instances? Or purposely structure parking enforcement signs so misleading and confusing, a military code breaking would be unable to decipher them? Not to mention, employ a fleet of corrupt parking Nazi's, who cite phony incidents to help line City pockets (I've been cited 3 times over the last decade, for infractions I clearly did NOT do. One of which, I wasn't even in the city at the time! So please don't tell me otherwise, David...). Anyone else either THAT corrupt or inept at their job would be fired. Except City of Toronto employees. Such attributes come under the headline of "qualifications". Not "vocational ineptness".
Hey Kids....I don't write the news. I just give you the unabridged version!
Gh0sT
March 10 Woman sues casino for her gambling addiction...... Interestingly enough, SHE'S A LAWYER. Maybe she knows Ronnie Roberts as well?
What a crock.
March 04 "It's not my fault, because....." Despite Mark Bonokoski's indifferent attitude towards the subject in the below article, I highly doubt given the opportunity, he'd want the man in question residing next to him:
The title of this blog, perfectly describes the life and attitude of Ronnie Roberts. Described as a 45 year-old violent, brain damaged alcoholic and drug abuser, with an extensive history of breaking the law and violating probation, Roberts goes above and beyond the duty to avoid taking responsibility for his actions at all costs. Upon his most recent breach of probation, his latest excuse was, "I was sharing a room with a guy using a needle. How am I supposed to stay straight when the guy I share a room with is shooting up right in front of me?".
I guess Roberts never heard of the notion of exercising a bit of self-restraint. Or evaluating the possible end result of his actions, before partaking of them. But why should he have to? He's catered to at every corner. By a justice system, that acts no better than a revolving door. By defence lawyers, who'll find an excuse for his every criminal act. And finally by columnists like Mr. Bonokoski. Who's essentially writes off an assault with a deadly weapon, as no big thing. I guess it's understandable that Roberts only follow their lead, right? The only one that seems to care about the end result in this whole drama is the Crown themselves.
Law enforcement officials use terms like "career" and "twillight", to more accurately describe the degree of a criminal's past and present behavior. If a criminal hasn't essentially cleaned up their act by middle-age, often refered to as their "twillight", they usually progress on to becoming "career criminals". A good, ol' fashion "shit-distruber" for the rest of the natural life. Unwilling to abide by the law, and hellbent on being a pain in the ass of everyday society. Ronnie Roberts is 45. He's clearly past his "twillight". And based on his own words, he obviously doesn't understand the notion of personal responsibility.
At least one psychiatrist blames Robert's behavior, on a supposed "brain injury" he received at age 8 (Again....Read the title of my blog. Starting to see a pattern here?). And how convientant that, while Roberts apparently has the time and means to apply for and receive, a monthly, permanent, "disability" cheque with which he lives off of (Paid for by us taxpayers. In addition to us paying for his "three hot's and a cot", while he's frequently incarcerated.), Roberts apparently DOES NOT have the time or means to seek out treatment for a "medical condition" that directly affects his life, and eventually our's, adversely.
Or maybe it's because he's too busy going to bars, using drugs, and assaulting people. I mean, a man's only got so much time on his hands, right?
Right.
Enjoy the digs, Ronnie. I'm footing the bill, unfortunately.
Gh0sT
March 02 "Doggy Death Row"..... Oh PLEASE! Spare me the melodrama......
It's interesting to note how groups such as "The Pit Bull Co-op".........
........brazenly flaunt Provincial law (not to mention the safety of your average citizen) for the sake of their own personal wants. And brag about doing so, in possibly the most widely dispersed newspaper in the GTA region. If these were firearms they were purposely trafficing, instead of illegal pit bulls (Which could be argued, are just as dangerous. Given their history of, like firearms, just "going off" too, and subsequent banning by the Province.), I wonder if they'd be so quick to open their mouth to the media. I sincerely hope their temporary onset of bravado, lands them in a court of law. Or, at the very least, up to their necks in civil lawsuits. For purposely putting public safety at risk. If you don't believe me, read the above article in it's entirety. They make absolutely NO false pretenses whatsoever, of what their agenda entails.
Let's get down to brass tacks, people.
Petty crimnals, drugs dealers, white trash, the overly paranoid, and people with small dicks. That pretty much comprises the elite class of indivdual, who choose to own such a breed of dog. I know I'll piss off alot of people by saying that. But, much like a referee, I'm forced to call it as I see it. Not to mention, I'm just as pissed off at them for jepordizing my safety with their selfish choices. So that's that. One could argue that I'm baised. Having been on the receiving end of not one, but TWO attacks myself. What one can't argue, is the fact that, since anti-pitbull legislation was passed in 2005, pit bull attacks have substantially declined: 71 in 2005, down to 44 in 2007. That's a fairly radical percentage drop for legislation that's only been in place a scant two years.
As far back as 2000, the Province was giving warning to pit bull owners, to either clean up their acts, or lose their dogs. But, as demonstrated previously, this "motley crue" of characters weren't about to demonstrate the courage of their convictions, by investing in dog traning and psychology classes. Or allowing the Province to dictate to them a series of regulations for them to abide by. Should they be absolutely serious about owning a breed, with such a violent and unstable behaviorial history. Well, guess what? By 2005, with attacks only getting worse, the Province finally had to step in regardless. Just for the greater good of everyone else. So now? All the bleeding-heart lobbiests are running to every media outlet with an open ear, crying foul.
Well, guys.....YOU DID IT TO YOURSELVES. SO SHUT UP AND STOP WHINING.
"Lassie you ain't!"
|
|
|
